The Universal Programming Language
The Universal Programming Language
Our company, CIS Inc., needs to standardize on a single programming language because senior management thinks the increased synergy will be amazing for productivity. As the lead of our different hardware and programming teams, your job is to recommend the correct programming language. Here is some information about our company:
We are a startup focused on developing applications designed to run on RISC-V (64 bit), ARM64, POWER9 (LE, 64 bit), and AMD64 processor architectures. The machines will have 128MB– 28GB of RAM available and will primarily run Linux, but the ARM64 and AMD64 architectures will also run Windows 10.
The Universal Programming Language
Our applications are managed through web interfaces via client computers with Edge, Chrome, Safari, and Firefox as the target browsers.
Our applications must be optimized to run at peak performance on the selected hardware, so please make sure the selected programming language can be compiled to machine language or a similar performing microcode. (C, C++, Objective C, C#, Visual Basic#, J#, Java, Python, Dotnet, Perl, and other languages are capable, too; these are not recommendations or limitations.)
With this information, research different programming languages and submit a two-to-three-page, 12-point font, double-spaced recommendation of which programming language our company should standardize on.
Grading Rubric for Writing Assignment
Your professor may use a slightly different rubric, but the standard rubric at AUR will assess your writing according to the following standards:
A (4) | B (3) | C (2) | D/F (1/0) | |
Focus: Purpose | Purpose is clear | Shows awareness of purpose | Shows limited awareness of purpose | No awareness |
Main idea | Clearly presents a | There is a main idea | Vague sense of a | No main idea |
main idea and | supported throughout | main idea, weakly | ||
supports it | most of the paper. | supported | ||
throughout the | throughout the | |||
paper. | paper. | |||
Organization: | Well-planned and | Good overall | There is a sense of | No sense of |
Overall | well-thought out. | organization, includes | organization, | organization |
Includes title, | the main | although some of the | ||
introduction, | organizational tools. | organizational tools | ||
statement of main | are used weakly or | |||
idea, transitions and | Missing | |||
conclusion. | ||||
Organization: | All paragraphs have | Most paragraphs have | Some paragraphs | Para. lack clear ideas |
Paragraphs | clear ideas, are | clear ideas, are | have clear ideas, | |
supported with | supported with some | support from | ||
examples and have | examples and have | examples may be | ||
smooth transitions. | transitions. | missing and | ||
transitions are weak. | ||||
Content | Exceptionally well- | Well-presented and | Content is sound and | Content is not sound |
presented and | argued; ideas are | solid; ideas are | ||
argued; ideas are | detailed, developed | present but not | ||
detailed, well- | and supported with | particularly | ||
developed, | evidence and details, | developed or | ||
supported with | mostly specific. | supported; some | ||
specific evidence & | evidence, but | |||
facts, as well as | usually of a | |||
examples and | generalized nature. | |||
specific details. | ||||
Research (if | Sources are | Sources are well | Sources support | The paper does not |
assignment | exceptionally well- | integrated and | some claims made in | use adequate |
includes a | integrated and they | support the paper’s | the paper, but might | research or if it does, |
research | support claims | claims. There may be | not be integrated | the sources are not |
component) | argued in the paper | occasional errors, but | well within the | integrated well. |
very effectively. | the sources and | paper’s argument. | They are not cited | |
Quotations and | Works Cited conform | There may be a few | correctly according | |
Works Cited | to MLA style sheet. | errors in MLA | to MLA style, nor | |
conform to MLA | style.. | listed correctly on | ||
style sheet. | the Works Cited | |||
page. | ||||
Style: Sentence | Sentences are clear | Sentences are clear | Sentences are | Sentences aren’t |
structure | and varied in | but may lack | generally clear but | clear |
pattern, from simple | variation; a few may | may have awkward | ||
to complex, with | be awkward and there | structure or unclear | ||
excellent use of | may be a few | content; there may | ||
punctuation. | punctuation errors. | be patterns of | ||
punctuation errors. | ||||
Style: Word | There is clear use of | There is an attempt at | There is little | No attempt at style |
choice, Tone | a personal and | a personal style but | attempt at style; | |
unique style of | style of writing may | reads as flat and | ||
writing, suited to | be awkward or | perhaps | ||
audience and | unsuited to audience | uninteresting in | ||
purpose; the paper | and purpose; the | content, which is | ||
holds the reader’s | reader may lose | usually generalized | ||
interest with ease. | interest in some | and clichéd. | ||
sections of the paper. | ||||
Style: Details | Large amounts of | Some use of specific | Little use of specific | No use of examples |
and Examples | specific examples | examples and | examples and | |
and detailed | detailed descriptions. | details; mostly | ||
descriptions. | May have extended | generalized | ||
examples that go on | examples and little | |||
for too long. | description. | |||
Grammar & | Excellent grammar, | A few errors in | Shows a pattern of | Continuous errors |
Mechanics | spelling, syntax and | grammar, spelling, | errors in spelling, | |
punctuation. | syntax and | grammar, syntax | ||
punctuation, but not | and/or punctuation. | |||
many. | Could also be a sign | |||
of lack of proof- | ||||
reading. |
The Universal Programming Language
Create an order via https://peakassignments.com/order if you need work on such topic and many more from different disciplines.