Posts

Health Insurance Comparison

Health Insurance Comparison

 

 

Research another developed country’s health care system (Canada, Japan, England, etc.) and use credible sources to compare their health care system to ours here in the U.S. (you can use reputable news articles, the country’s governmental websites, or a peer-reviewed journal article that discusses another country’s health care system). Discuss the health care system for the country that you have chosen (is it privatized, socialized, required…?) and compare to our health care system. Which do you think is the better system and why?

Health Insurance Comparison

Assignment should be 2-3 pages, double spaced, and sources should be cited using proper APA format. Minimum of 3 sources per country (6 total).

Health Insurance Comparison

Grading Rubric for Writing Assignment

Your professor may use a slightly different rubric, but the standard rubric at AUR will assess your writing according to the following standards:

 

 

  A (4)   B (3) C (2) D/F (1/0)
Focus: Purpose Purpose is clear   Shows awareness of purpose Shows limited awareness of purpose No awareness
Main idea Clearly presents a   There is a main idea Vague sense of a No main idea
  main idea and   supported throughout main idea, weakly  
  supports it   most of the paper. supported  
  throughout the     throughout the  
  paper.     paper.  
Organization: Well-planned and   Good overall There is a sense of No sense of
Overall well-thought out.   organization, includes organization, organization
  Includes title,   the main although some of the  
  introduction,   organizational tools. organizational tools  
  statement of main     are used weakly or  
  idea, transitions and     Missing  
  conclusion.        
Organization: All paragraphs have   Most paragraphs have Some paragraphs Para. lack clear ideas
Paragraphs clear ideas, are   clear ideas, are have clear ideas,  
  supported with   supported with some support from  
  examples and have   examples and have examples may be  
  smooth transitions.   transitions. missing and  
        transitions are weak.  
Content Exceptionally well-   Well-presented and Content is sound and Content is not sound
  presented and   argued; ideas are solid; ideas are  
  argued; ideas are   detailed, developed present but not  
  detailed, well-   and supported with particularly  
  developed,   evidence and details, developed or  
  supported with   mostly specific. supported; some  
  specific evidence &     evidence, but  
  facts, as well as     usually of a  
  examples and     generalized nature.  
  specific details.        
Research (if Sources are   Sources are well Sources support The paper does not
assignment exceptionally well-   integrated and some claims made in use adequate
includes a integrated and they   support the paper’s the paper, but might research or if it does,
research support claims   claims. There may be not be integrated the sources are not
component) argued in the paper   occasional errors, but well within the integrated well.
  very effectively.   the sources and paper’s argument. They are not cited
  Quotations and   Works Cited conform There may be a few correctly according
  Works Cited   to MLA style sheet. errors in MLA to MLA style, nor
  conform to MLA     style.. listed correctly on
  style sheet.       the Works Cited
          page.
Style: Sentence Sentences are clear   Sentences are clear Sentences are Sentences aren’t
structure and varied in   but may lack generally clear but clear
  pattern, from simple   variation; a few may may have awkward  
  to complex, with   be awkward and there structure or unclear  
  excellent use of   may be a few content; there may  
  punctuation.   punctuation errors. be patterns of  
        punctuation errors.  
Style: Word There is clear use of   There is an attempt at There is little No attempt at style
choice, Tone a personal and   a personal style but attempt at style;  
  unique style of   style of writing may reads as flat and  
  writing, suited to   be awkward or perhaps  
  audience and   unsuited to audience uninteresting in  
  purpose; the paper   and purpose; the content, which is  
  holds the reader’s   reader may lose usually generalized  
  interest with ease.   interest in some and clichéd.  
      sections of the paper.    
Style: Details Large amounts of   Some use of specific Little use of specific No use of examples
and Examples specific examples   examples and examples and  
  and detailed   detailed descriptions. details; mostly  
  descriptions.   May have extended generalized  
      examples that go on examples and little  
      for too long. description.  
Grammar & Excellent grammar,   A few errors in Shows a pattern of Continuous errors
Mechanics spelling, syntax and   grammar, spelling, errors in spelling,  
  punctuation.   syntax and grammar, syntax  
      punctuation, but not and/or punctuation.  
      many. Could also be a sign  
        of lack of proof-  

lth Insurance Comparison

Create an order via https://peakassignments.com/order if you need work on such topic and many more from different disciplines.

 

 

Historical and Contemporary Comparison

Historical and Contemporary Comparison
The purpose of this project is to compare and contrast a significant work of historical architecture (before 1500 CE) and a significant modern or contemporary work of architecture in Los Angeles.

The research pa.per will be 2000 words in length, plus diagrams, images and a list of works cited.

Choose from the list below, or propose a comparison to the instructor via Canvas message.

Historical and Contemporary Comparison

Suggested comparisons include:

The Athenian Acropolis and the Getty Center, Brentwood
The Villa of the Papyri, Herculaneum and the Getty Villa, Malibu
The Pantheon, Rome and the Griffith Observatory, Hollywood
The Colosseum, Rome and the SoFi Stadium, Inglewood
Saint-Étienne, Caen, France (or other Romanesque Cathedral) and the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angeles, Downtown Los Angeles
Katsura Imperial Villa and Gardens, Kyoto, Japan and The Gamble House, Pasadena
Governor’s Palace + Nunnery, Uxmal, ca 900CE and the Barnsdall House, Frank Lloyd Wright, Hollywood
Diagrams and images include:

Exterior Photograph
Interior Photograph
Site Context
Site Plan
Plan
Section
Front Elevation
Organization – axis, symmetry, module
Circulation – approach, threshold, program and path
Structure
Where appropriate all diagrams must have the following:
North Arrow
Scale
Scale Figure
Descriptive Caption and source

Grading Rubric for Writing Assignment

Your professor may use a slightly different rubric, but the standard rubric at AUR will assess your writing according to the following standards:

 

 

  A (4) B (3) C (2) D/F (1/0)
Focus: Purpose Purpose is clear Shows awareness of purpose Shows limited awareness of purpose No awareness
Main idea Clearly presents a There is a main idea Vague sense of a No main idea
  main idea and supported throughout main idea, weakly  
  supports it most of the paper. supported  
  throughout the   throughout the  
  paper.   paper.  
Organization: Well-planned and Good overall There is a sense of No sense of
Overall well-thought out. organization, includes organization, organization
  Includes title, the main although some of the  
  introduction, organizational tools. organizational tools  
  statement of main   are used weakly or  
  idea, transitions and   Missing  
  conclusion.      
Organization: All paragraphs have Most paragraphs have Some paragraphs Para. lack clear ideas
Paragraphs clear ideas, are clear ideas, are have clear ideas,  
  supported with supported with some support from  
  examples and have examples and have examples may be  
  smooth transitions. transitions. missing and  
      transitions are weak.  
Content Exceptionally well- Well-presented and Content is sound and Content is not sound
  presented and argued; ideas are solid; ideas are  
  argued; ideas are detailed, developed present but not  
  detailed, well- and supported with particularly  
  developed, evidence and details, developed or  
  supported with mostly specific. supported; some  
  specific evidence &   evidence, but  
  facts, as well as   usually of a  
  examples and   generalized nature.  
  specific details.      
Research (if Sources are Sources are well Sources support The paper does not
assignment exceptionally well- integrated and some claims made in use adequate
includes a integrated and they support the paper’s the paper, but might research or if it does,
research support claims claims. There may be not be integrated the sources are not
component) argued in the paper occasional errors, but well within the integrated well.
  very effectively. the sources and paper’s argument. They are not cited
  Quotations and Works Cited conform There may be a few correctly according
  Works Cited to MLA style sheet. errors in MLA to MLA style, nor
  conform to MLA   style.. listed correctly on
  style sheet.     the Works Cited
        page.
Style: Sentence Sentences are clear Sentences are clear Sentences are Sentences aren’t
structure and varied in but may lack generally clear but clear
  pattern, from simple variation; a few may may have awkward  
  to complex, with be awkward and there structure or unclear  
  excellent use of may be a few content; there may  
  punctuation. punctuation errors. be patterns of  
      punctuation errors.  
Style: Word There is clear use of There is an attempt at There is little No attempt at style
choice, Tone a personal and a personal style but attempt at style;  
  unique style of style of writing may reads as flat and  
  writing, suited to be awkward or perhaps  
  audience and unsuited to audience uninteresting in  
  purpose; the paper and purpose; the content, which is  
  holds the reader’s reader may lose usually generalized  
  interest with ease. interest in some and clichéd.  
    sections of the paper.    
Style: Details Large amounts of Some use of specific Little use of specific No use of examples
and Examples specific examples examples and examples and  
  and detailed detailed descriptions. details; mostly  
  descriptions. May have extended generalized  
    examples that go on examples and little  
    for too long. description.  
Grammar & Excellent grammar, A few errors in Shows a pattern of Continuous errors
Mechanics spelling, syntax and grammar, spelling, errors in spelling,  
  punctuation. syntax and grammar, syntax  
    punctuation, but not and/or punctuation.  
    many. Could also be a sign  
      of lack of proof-  
      reading.  

 

 

Historical and Contemporary Comparison

Create an order via https://peakassignments.com/order if you need work on such topic and many more from different disciplines.

 

Comparison of Various Variables

Comparison of Various Variables
Compare independent variables, dependent variables, and extraneous variables. Describe two ways that researchers attempt to control extraneous variables.

Grading Rubric for Writing Assignment

Your professor may use a slightly different rubric, but the standard rubric at AUR will assess your writing according to the following standards:

 

 

  A (4) B (3) C (2) D/F (1/0)
Focus: Purpose Purpose is clear Shows awareness of purpose Shows limited awareness of purpose No awareness
Main idea Clearly presents a There is a main idea Vague sense of a No main idea
  main idea and supported throughout main idea, weakly  
  supports it most of the paper. supported  
  throughout the   throughout the  
  paper.   paper.  
Organization: Well-planned and Good overall There is a sense of No sense of
Overall well-thought out. organization, includes organization, organization
  Includes title, the main although some of the  
  introduction, organizational tools. organizational tools  
  statement of main   are used weakly or  
  idea, transitions and   Missing  
  conclusion.      
Organization: All paragraphs have Most paragraphs have Some paragraphs Para. lack clear ideas
Paragraphs clear ideas, are clear ideas, are have clear ideas,  
  supported with supported with some support from  
  examples and have examples and have examples may be  
  smooth transitions. transitions. missing and  
      transitions are weak.  
Content Exceptionally well- Well-presented and Content is sound and Content is not sound
  presented and argued; ideas are solid; ideas are  
  argued; ideas are detailed, developed present but not  
  detailed, well- and supported with particularly  
  developed, evidence and details, developed or  
  supported with mostly specific. supported; some  
  specific evidence &   evidence, but  
  facts, as well as   usually of a  
  examples and   generalized nature.  
  specific details.      
Research (if Sources are Sources are well Sources support The paper does not
assignment exceptionally well- integrated and some claims made in use adequate
includes a integrated and they support the paper’s the paper, but might research or if it does,
research support claims claims. There may be not be integrated the sources are not
component) argued in the paper occasional errors, but well within the integrated well.
  very effectively. the sources and paper’s argument. They are not cited
  Quotations and Works Cited conform There may be a few correctly according
  Works Cited to MLA style sheet. errors in MLA to MLA style, nor
  conform to MLA   style.. listed correctly on
  style sheet.     the Works Cited
        page.
Style: Sentence Sentences are clear Sentences are clear Sentences are Sentences aren’t
structure and varied in but may lack generally clear but clear
  pattern, from simple variation; a few may may have awkward  
  to complex, with be awkward and there structure or unclear  
  excellent use of may be a few content; there may  
  punctuation. punctuation errors. be patterns of  
      punctuation errors.  
Style: Word There is clear use of There is an attempt at There is little No attempt at style
choice, Tone a personal and a personal style but attempt at style;  
  unique style of style of writing may reads as flat and  
  writing, suited to be awkward or perhaps  
  audience and unsuited to audience uninteresting in  
  purpose; the paper and purpose; the content, which is  
  holds the reader’s reader may lose usually generalized  
  interest with ease. interest in some and clichéd.  
    sections of the paper.    
Style: Details Large amounts of Some use of specific Little use of specific No use of examples
and Examples specific examples examples and examples and  
  and detailed detailed descriptions. details; mostly  
  descriptions. May have extended generalized  
    examples that go on examples and little  
    for too long. description.  
Grammar & Excellent grammar, A few errors in Shows a pattern of Continuous errors
Mechanics spelling, syntax and grammar, spelling, errors in spelling,  
  punctuation. syntax and grammar, syntax  
    punctuation, but not and/or punctuation.  
    many. Could also be a sign  
      of lack of proof-  
      reading.  

 

Comparison of Various Variables

Create an order via https://peakassignments.com/order if you need work on such topic and many more from different disciplines.

 

Comparison of the Four Scaling Methods

Comparison of the Four Scaling Methods
Write a substantive 2000 word comparison of the four scaling methods below.
LeSS (Links to an external site.)
Nexus (Links to an external site.)
Disciplined Agile Delivery (Links to an external site.)
SAFe (Links to an external site.)
Discuss the following for each method
1. Roles – discuss the roles in this method that is not part of Scrum and how they impact the method
2. Processes- discuss any processes in the method that are not part of Scrum and how they are used within the method
3. Artifacts – discuss any artifacts (i.e. product backlog is a Scrum artifact) that are not part of Scrum and how they are used within the method
Make sure to use APA style and cite all sources.

Create an order via https://peakassignments.com/order if you need work on such topic and many more from different disciplines.

Rubric

Scaling Method Comparison

Scaling Method Comparison
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSubmitted on time
20 pts

Full marks

0 pts

No marks

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWord count is met
20 pts

Full marks

0 pts

No marks

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLeSS comparison includes Roles, Processes, and Artifacts
15 pts

All 3 are included

10 pts

Only 2 are included

15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNexus comparison includes Roles, Processes, and Artifacts
15 pts

All 3 are included

10 pts

Only 2 are included

5 pts

Only 1 is included

0 pts

None are included

15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDisciplined Agile Delivery comparison includes Roles, Processes, and Artifacts
15 pts

All 3 are included

10 pts

Only 2 are included

5 pts

Only 1 is included

0 pts

None are included

15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSAFe comparison includes Roles, Processes, and Artifacts
15 pts

All 3 are included

10 pts

Only 2 are included

5 pts

Only 1 is included

0 pts

None are included

15 pts
Total Points: 100

Comparison of the Four Scaling Methods

Create an order via https://peakassignments.com/order if you need work on such topic and many more from different disciplines.