System Roles and Separation of Duties
System Roles and Separation of Duties
P.S- I really need someone who either has done a lot of computer science papers or is a tech nerd to understand this assignment
After Snowden the NSA has become increasingly concerned that there may be backdoors in some internal NSA applications. Assume you have been assigned the role of Security Architect for the NSA Software Applications team. The team is tasked with developing an application to detect backdoors in NSA applications.
Your task for this assignment is to design an application for detecting backdoors on NSA Applications.
You design should include the following:
1. A high level overview of what the application will do.
2. Discuss the Software Architecture, i.e Is it Client-Server, Standalone … etc.
3. Define the System Requirements (What does the system need to detect?) Explore the resources section for help here.
4. Define the System Roles and any Separation of Duties
5. Discuss how you will handle data integrity in the system.
6. Discuss how you will handle system exceptions
7. Discuss the SDLC that you will use to implement the software and how you will handle issues during development
8. Provide a powerpoint and recording in a briefing style approach. This means, assume you are briefing the rest of the development team and stakeholders.
Your powerpoint should be at-least 7 slides.
I’m including files that my teacher posted for refrences along with a few links he gave us. he did not give specific instructions of how our power point has to look or anything.
https://towardsdatascience.com/10-common-software-architectural-patterns-in-a-nutshell-a0b47a1e9013 (this is for number 2)
https://www.guru99.com/learn-software-requirements-analysis-with-case-study.html
(this helps with number 3)
https://auth0.com/docs/authorization/rbac
(this link hekps with number 4)
Grading Rubric for Writing Assignment
Your professor may use a slightly different rubric, but the standard rubric at AUR will assess your writing according to the following standards:
A (4) | B (3) | C (2) | D/F (1/0) | |
Focus: Purpose | Purpose is clear | Shows awareness of purpose | Shows limited awareness of purpose | No awareness |
Main idea | Clearly presents a | There is a main idea | Vague sense of a | No main idea |
main idea and | supported throughout | main idea, weakly | ||
supports it | most of the paper. | supported | ||
throughout the | throughout the | |||
paper. | paper. | |||
Organization: | Well-planned and | Good overall | There is a sense of | No sense of |
Overall | well-thought out. | organization, includes | organization, | organization |
Includes title, | the main | although some of the | ||
introduction, | organizational tools. | organizational tools | ||
statement of main | are used weakly or | |||
idea, transitions and | Missing | |||
conclusion. | ||||
Organization: | All paragraphs have | Most paragraphs have | Some paragraphs | Para. lack clear ideas |
Paragraphs | clear ideas, are | clear ideas, are | have clear ideas, | |
supported with | supported with some | support from | ||
examples and have | examples and have | examples may be | ||
smooth transitions. | transitions. | missing and | ||
transitions are weak. | ||||
Content | Exceptionally well- | Well-presented and | Content is sound and | Content is not sound |
presented and | argued; ideas are | solid; ideas are | ||
argued; ideas are | detailed, developed | present but not | ||
detailed, well- | and supported with | particularly | ||
developed, | evidence and details, | developed or | ||
supported with | mostly specific. | supported; some | ||
specific evidence & | evidence, but | |||
facts, as well as | usually of a | |||
examples and | generalized nature. | |||
specific details. | ||||
Research (if | Sources are | Sources are well | Sources support | The paper does not |
assignment | exceptionally well- | integrated and | some claims made in | use adequate |
includes a | integrated and they | support the paper’s | the paper, but might | research or if it does, |
research | support claims | claims. There may be | not be integrated | the sources are not |
component) | argued in the paper | occasional errors, but | well within the | integrated well. |
very effectively. | the sources and | paper’s argument. | They are not cited | |
Quotations and | Works Cited conform | There may be a few | correctly according | |
Works Cited | to MLA style sheet. | errors in MLA | to MLA style, nor | |
conform to MLA | style.. | listed correctly on | ||
style sheet. | the Works Cited | |||
page. | ||||
Style: Sentence | Sentences are clear | Sentences are clear | Sentences are | Sentences aren’t |
structure | and varied in | but may lack | generally clear but | clear |
pattern, from simple | variation; a few may | may have awkward | ||
to complex, with | be awkward and there | structure or unclear | ||
excellent use of | may be a few | content; there may | ||
punctuation. | punctuation errors. | be patterns of | ||
punctuation errors. | ||||
Style: Word | There is clear use of | There is an attempt at | There is little | No attempt at style |
choice, Tone | a personal and | a personal style but | attempt at style; | |
unique style of | style of writing may | reads as flat and | ||
writing, suited to | be awkward or | perhaps | ||
audience and | unsuited to audience | uninteresting in | ||
purpose; the paper | and purpose; the | content, which is | ||
holds the reader’s | reader may lose | usually generalized | ||
interest with ease. | interest in some | and clichéd. | ||
sections of the paper. | ||||
Style: Details | Large amounts of | Some use of specific | Little use of specific | No use of examples |
and Examples | specific examples | examples and | examples and | |
and detailed | detailed descriptions. | details; mostly | ||
descriptions. | May have extended | generalized | ||
examples that go on | examples and little | |||
for too long. | description. | |||
Grammar & | Excellent grammar, | A few errors in | Shows a pattern of | Continuous errors |
Mechanics | spelling, syntax and | grammar, spelling, | errors in spelling, | |
punctuation. | syntax and | grammar, syntax | ||
punctuation, but not | and/or punctuation. | |||
many. | Could also be a sign | |||
of lack of proof- | ||||
reading. |
System Roles and Separation of Duties
Create an order via https://peakassignments.com/order if you need work on such topic and many more from different disciplines.