Introduction and Resources Module
Introduction and Resources Module
Your Course Project Part 2 is due this week. Please see the Course Project Overview page located in the Introduction and Resources module for further details. Remember to use the templates provided.
Introduction and Resources Module
Note: Integrate Sections A, B, C, D, E, F, and G in an single document.
Introduction and Resources Module
Rubric
LMA.MGMT404.JUL20
LMA.MGMT404.JUL20
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
15 to >13.0 pts
Excellent
The introduction clearly summarizes all of key aspects of the project, including: project description, goals and objectives, project team management approach, and impact of the internal and external factors that may promote or hinder individual decisions and the management of people, procedures, processes, and projects.
13 to >11.0 pts
Competent
The introduction clearly summarizes most of the key aspects of the project, including: project description, goals and objectives, project team management approach, and impact of the internal and external factors that may promote or hinder individual decisions and the management of people, procedures, processes, and projects.
11 to >9.0 pts
Fair
The introduction clearly summarizes few of the key aspects of the project, including: project description, goals and objectives, project team management approach, and impact of the internal and external factors that may promote or hinder individual decisions and the management of people, procedures, processes, and projects.
9 to >1.0 pts
Poor
The introduction does not include most of the key aspects of the project, including: project description, goals and objectives, project team management approach, and impact of the internal and external factors that may promote or hinder individual decisions and the management of people, procedures, processes, and projects.
1 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The introduction is missing.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProject Charter
20 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
The 11 elements of the project charter are clearly described and all the questions in the assignment have been addressed.
18 to >16.0 pts
Competent
Most of the 11 elements of the project charter have been described and/or most of the questions in the assignments have been addressed.
16 to >14.0 pts
Fair
Some elements of the project charter have been described clearly and/or some but not all of the questions in the assignment have been addressed.
14 to >12.0 pts
Poor
The project charter does not contain most of the 11 elements and/or most of the questions have not been addressed appropriately.
12 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The project charter is missing, only a few of the 11 elements and/or the questions have been addressed.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStakeholder Engagement Plan
20 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
All stakeholders are identified for the project and the stakeholder engagement plan contains all required elements.
18 to >16.0 pts
Competent
The stakeholder engagement plan contains most of the required elements for the listed stakeholders.
16 to >14.0 pts
Fair
The stakeholder engagement plan contains some of the required elements for the listed stakeholders.
14 to >12.0 pts
Poor
Only a few stakeholders are listed and most of the elements required for the stakeholder engagement plan are missing.
12 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The stakeholder engagement plan is absent or has just a few items related to stakeholders.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunications Management Plan
20 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
All stakeholders are listed on the communications management plan and the seven elements are addressed for each stakeholder.
18 to >16.0 pts
Competent
Most stakeholders are listed on the communications management plan or some of the elements are not addressed for each stakeholder.
16 to >14.0 pts
Fair
Some stakeholders are listed on the communications management plan or many elements are not addressed for each stakeholder.
14 to >12.0 pts
Poor
The communications management plan contains very few stakeholders or most elements are not addressed for each stakeholder.
12 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The communications management plan is not present or does not contain communication information for the stakeholders.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProject Scope Statement
20 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
The scope of the project is clearly defined and the 10 elements of the scope statement are addressed with appropriate detail.
18 to >16.0 pts
Competent
The scope of the project is defined but one or two of the elements of the scope statement are not addressed with adequate detail.
16 to >14.0 pts
Fair
The scope of the project is defined but many elements of the scope statement are not addressed with adequate detail.
14 to >12.0 pts
Poor
The scope statement is not defined well and/or most of the elements of the scope statement are not addressed with adequate detail.
12 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The scope statement is missing or only contains a few of the elements.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWork Breakdown Structure and Project Schedule
20 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
The work breakdown structure (WBS) and project schedule are created in MS Project or similar software and contain the appropriate work packages and activities for the project.
18 to >16.0 pts
Competent
The work breakdown structure (WBS) and project schedule are created in MS Project or similar software and contain most of the appropriate work packages and activities for the project.
16 to >14.0 pts
Fair
The work breakdown structure (WBS) and project schedule are created in MS Project or similar software and contain some of the appropriate work packages and activities for the project.
14 to >12.0 pts
Poor
The work breakdown structure (WBS) and project schedule are created in MS Project or similar software but lack most of the appropriate work packages and activities for the project.
12 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The work breakdown structure (WBS) and project schedule are not evident or only contain a few required elements.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Allocation and Budget Reports
20 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
The project budget contains the required elements described in the assignment and resources are allocated for all applicable activities.
18 to >16.0 pts
Competent
Most of the elements of the project budget are described or some resources are not allocated for all the applicable activities.
16 to >14.0 pts
Fair
Most of the required elements of the project budget are not described or many resources are not allocated for the applicable activities.
14 to >12.0 pts
Poor
The project budget does not contain appropriate detail for the elements or most resources are not allocated for the applicable activities.
12 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The project budget and/or resource allocation is missing or very few of the required elements are present.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRisk Register
20 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
The risk register contains appropriate risks and all the elements of the risk register are completed for the risks.
18 to >16.0 pts
Competent
The risk register contains most of the required risks and/or some elements of the risk register not completed.
16 to >14.0 pts
Fair
The risk register contains some of the required risks and/or many elements of the risk register are not completed.
14 to >12.0 pts
Poor
The risk register contains very few of the required risks and/or most elements are not completed on the risk register.
12 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The risk register is missing or only has a few risks that are not addressed completely.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat and Writing Quality, including APA Formatting
10 to >9.0 pts
Excellent
The document includes the appropriate content and sections. The paper is written using a professional tone. The document is APA-compliant with accurate in-text citations supporting full citations on the reference page. The report contains no spelling, grammar, typographical, or formatting errors. Writing quality is excellent, clear, organized, and professional.
9 to >8.0 pts
Competent
Most of the following items are met: The document includes the appropriate content and sections. The paper is written using a professional tone. The document is APA-compliant with accurate in-text citations supporting full citations on the reference page. The report contains no spelling, grammar, typographical, or formatting errors. Writing quality is excellent, clear, organized, and professional.
8 to >7.0 pts
Fair
Some of the following items are met: The document includes the appropriate content and sections. The paper is written using a professional tone. The document is APA-compliant with accurate in-text citations supporting full citations on the reference page. The report contains no spelling, grammar, typographical, or formatting errors. Writing quality is excellent, clear, organized, and professional.
7 to >6.0 pts
Poor
A few of the following items are met: The document includes the appropriate content and sections. The paper is written using a professional tone. The document is APA-compliant with accurate in-text citations supporting full citations on the reference page. The report contains no spelling, grammar, typographical, or formatting errors. Writing quality is excellent, clear, organized, and professional.
6 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Nearly all of the following items are not met: The document includes the appropriate content and sections. The paper is written using a professional tone. The document is APA-compliant with accurate in-text citations supporting full citations on the reference page. The report contains no spelling, grammar, typographical, or formatting errors. Writing quality is excellent, clear, organized, and professional.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
10 to >9.0 pts
Excellent
The conclusion clearly describes the theoretical and technical knowledge applied to manage the course project successfully and provides a self evaluation on how successfully the project management concepts, techniques, and skills have been applied to the course project.
9 to >8.0 pts
Competent
The conclusion describes most of the theoretical and technical knowledge applied to manage the course project successfully and provides a self evaluation on how successfully the project management concepts, techniques, and skills have been applied to the course project.
8 to >7.0 pts
Fair
The conclusion briefly describes some the theoretical and technical knowledge applied to manage the course project successfully and provides a self evaluation on how successfully the project management concepts, techniques, and skills have been applied to the course project.
7 to >6.0 pts
Poor
The conclusion lacks most of the theoretical and technical knowledge applied to manage the course project successfully and/or does not provide a self evaluation on how successfully the project management concepts, techniques, and skills have been applied to the course project.
6 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The conclusion does not describe any theoretical and technical knowledge applied to manage the course project successfully and does not provide a self evaluation on how successfully the project management concepts, techniques, and skills have been applied to the course project.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUGB.PROJ2020-A
Apply a broad theoretical and technical understanding of the project management discipline to manage projects successfully.
threshold: 0.5 pts
1 pts
Excellent: The application of theoretical and technical understanding of the project management discipline to manage projects successfully is strongly evident in the student’s submission.
0.75 pts
Competent: The application of theoretical and technical understanding of the project management discipline to manage projects successfully is mostly evident in the student’s submission.
0.5 pts
Fair: The application of theoretical and technical understanding of the project management discipline to manage projects successfully is somewhat evident in the student’s submission.
0.25 pts
Poor: The application of theoretical and technical understanding of the project management discipline to manage projects successfully is only slightly evident in the student’s submission.
0 pts
Unacceptable: The application of theoretical and technical understanding of the project management discipline to manage projects successfully is not evident in the student’s submission.
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUGB.PROJ2020-B
Evaluate the various project management concepts and techniques used in the management of projects.
threshold: 0.5 pts
1 pts
Excellent: An evaluation of various project maangement concepts and techniques used in the management of projects is clearly evident in the student’s submission.
0.75 pts
Competent: An evaluation of various project management concepts and techniques used in the management of projects is mostly evident in the student’s submission.
0.5 pts
Fair: An evaluation of various project management concepts and techniques used in the management of projects is somewhat evident in the student’s submission.
0.25 pts
Poor: An evaluation of various project management concepts and techniques used in the management of projects is only slightly evident in the student’s submission.
0 pts
Unacceptable: An evaluation of various project management concepts and techniques used in the management of projects is not evident in the student’s submission.
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUGB.PROJ2020-C
Implement innovative project approaches to solve specialized business problems in predictable and unpredictable environments.
threshold: 0.5 pts
1 pts
Excellent: The implementation of innovative project approaches to solve specialized business problems in predictable and unpredictable environments is clearly evident in the student’s submission.
0.75 pts
Competent: The implementation of innovative project approaches to solve specialized business problems in predictable and unpredictable environments is mostly evident in the student’s submission.
0.5 pts
Fair: The implementation of innovative project approaches to solve specialized business problems in predictable and unpredictable environments is somewhat evident in the student’s submission.
0.25 pts
Poor: The implementation of innovative project approaches to solve specialized business problems in predictable and unpredictable environments is only slightly evident in the student’s submission.
0 pts
Unacceptable: The implementation of innovative project approaches to solve specialized business problems in predictable and unpredictable environmentst is not evident in the student’s submission.
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUGB.PROJ2020-D
Manage complex professional and technical activities and to navigate risk in various contexts within the project management framework.
threshold: 0.5 pts
1 pts
Excellent: The management of professional and technical activities and the navigation risk in various contexts within the project management framework is clearly evident in the student’s submission.
0.75 pts
Competent: The management of professional and technical activities and the navigation risk in various contexts within the project management framework is mostly evident in the student’s submission.
0.5 pts
Fair: The management of professional and technical activities and the navigation risk in various contexts within the project management framework is somewhat evident in the student’s submission.
0.25 pts
Poor: The management of professional and technical activities and the navigation risk in various contexts within the project management framework is only slightly evident in the student’s submission.
0 pts
Unacceptable: The management of professional and technical activities and the navigation risk in various contexts within the project management frameworkt is not evident in the student’s submission.
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUGB.PROJ2020-E
Assess the impact of internal and external factors that may promote or hinder individual decisions and the management of people, procedures, processes, and projects.
threshold: 0.5 pts
1 pts
Excellent: Assessing the impact of internal and external factors that may promote or hinder individual decisions and the management of people, procedures, processes, and projects is clearly evident in the student’s submission.
0.75 pts
Competent: Assessing the impact of internal and external factors that may promote or hinder individual decisions and the management of people, procedures, processes, and projects is mostly evident in the student’s submission.
0.5 pts
Fair: Assessing the impact of internal and external factors that may promote or hinder individual decisions and the management of people, procedures, processes, and projects is somewhat evident in the student’s submission.
0.25 pts
Poor: Assessing the impact of internal and external factors that may promote or hinder individual decisions and the management of people, procedures, processes, and projects is only slightly evident in the student’s submission.
0 pts
Unacceptable: Assessing the impact of internal and external factors that may promote or hinder individual decisions and the management of people, procedures, processes, and projects is not evident in the student’s submission.
1 pts
Total Points: 180
Previous
Top
Course Project Part 2 (Due Week 8)
The Course Project Part 2 assignment is the integration of all the sections that you have covered in the previous weeks (Introduction and Sections A through E) plus Sections F, G, and the Conclusion. Part 2 should be completely integrated and presented in a logical order, written professionally and free of spelling and grammar errors, and updated with any changes that occurred along the way, including corrections and advice provided by your professor.
Expand AllPanels Collapse AllPanels
Section F: Resource Allocation and Budget Reports
To complete this section, you must continue working on your MS Project file and add the information in the Week 5 Getta Byte project video.
Introduction and Resources Module
Step 1: Allocate resources.
Step 2: Review costs.
Step 3: Analyze your resource allocation and assignments.
Step 4: Print the Gantt chart.
Step 5: Print resource allocation report.
Step 6: Print the project budget report.
Note: Microsoft Project is a project management information system (PMIS) designed to aid project managers in the development of schedules, assigning of resources, tracking progress, managing the budget, and analyzing workloads for projects. In this course, the Microsoft Project schedule is created in Section E and completed in Section F after adding the allocation and budgeting of resources.
Section G: Risk Register
Use the Risk Register Template spreadsheet to complete your assignment.
Identify and analyze your project risks.
Plan and implement risk responses.
Monitor the project risks.
Instructions
Introduction and Resources Module
Review the Week 6 Getta Byte Software Risk Management video located in the Week 6 Lesson; the video provides examples of 3 negative risks.
Apply the risk management process learned in the Week 6 reading assignments (i.e., Chapter 11 of the Contemporary Project Management textbook and Part 1 Section 11 of the PMBOK® Guide. to identify, assess, and plan risk responses for five positive and five negative risks other than the examples provided in the video using the Risk Register Template located in the Project Templates section below.
For the risk identification process, be sure to assess the following process inputs: 1) Internal and external enterprise environmental factors and 2) the organizational process assets. Next, proceed to complete the following identification columns in the Risk Register Template.
Introduction and Resources Module
Category
Risk Name
Risk Description
Risk Owner
Reason/Root Cause
Effect/Impact on Project Objectives
For the assessment process complete the following columns.
Probability of occurrence
Impact/Cost
Impact/Time
Impact/Quality
Risk Score (i.e., probability times impact)
For the Plan Risk Response process complete the following columns.
Risk Response Strategy
Cost
Note: The risks identified in the Week 6 Getta Byte project video are negative risk examples.
Introduction and Resources Module
Conclusion
Instructions
Introduction and Resources Module
Describe how the student applied theoretical and technical knowledge of the project management discipline to manage the course project successfully.
Conduct a short self evaluation on how successfully the project management concepts, techniques, and skills have been applied to the course project.
Introduction and Resources Module
Create an order via https://peakassignments.com/order if you need work on such topic and many more from different disciplines.
